Blogy

YO

(CBS News) What would Academy Awards Sunday be without our own Oscar prognosticator David Edelstein?

Last year, I sat here and predicted every Oscar winner. Had I gabbed with Academy members? Nope. Can I foretell the future? Sorry. Did I just love the big winner, "The Artist"? Definitely not.

I'd simply read certain columnists who'd been spun by certain publicists who'd been hired by certain studios that had squired certain nominees around Hollywood to screenings and cocktail parties to influence the votes of a few thousand people -- most over 55, white, well-off and liberal.

More in The Academy Awards

This year it's even busier. Harvey Weinstein, all-mighty poobah of Oscar buzz, got Dr. Mehmet Oz to extol "Silver Linings Playbook" for its insights into mental illness.

Look, I like the movie. It's a good, https://www.tyjryi7h.online - https://www.tyjryi7h.online dark rom-com about a couple of cute depressives. Maybe it's even therapeutic to see people crazier than WE are. I'm just not certain of its medical efficacy.

Meanwhile, Steven Spielberg brought in a master to spin for "Lincoln": Bill Clinton! You hire awards consultants like political consultants. You stay ahead of the message.

Or you end up like Kathryn Bigelow, whose phenomenal "Zero Dark Thirty" was an early favorite, but maybe a tad fast-and-loose - https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/tad%20fast-and-loose with facts in saying torture led to the courier who led to bin Laden. True or false, the controversy hasn't played well -- proof in one way torture doesn't work. Reportedly. I've read this, from columnists spun by publicists working for "Zero Dark Thirty" rivals.

They also say it's "Argo" for Best Picture because people feel bad that Ben Affleck wasn't nominated for Best Director -- - http://www.squidoo.com/search/results?q=Director%20-- his loss the movie's gain. And it doesn't hurt that the film makes Hollywood types look heroic.

Oscars 2013: Take our Best Picture poll!Watch: Predicting the winners with Hollywood Reporter's Erin CarlsonWatch: A. O. Scott and Michael Phillips' Oscar predictionsComplete coverage: 2013 Oscars

Clinton might help Spielberg win Best Director. I'm guessing Dr. Oz fave Jennifer Lawrence for Best Actress, though there's a dark horse in "Amour"'s Emmanuelle Riva.

Anne Hathaway has been on the campaign trail for "Les Miserables" and she'll get it, not in spite of looking like a chicken when she sings but BECAUSE of it. Flamboyant anti-vanity: It sells.

I'm betting Tommy Lee Jones for "Lincoln," but some are predicting Robert De Niro for "Silver Linings Playbook" if people find Jones too much of a sourpuss, which he kind of is.

The lock, of course, is Daniel Day-Lewis, who as Shakespeare would say "doth bestride the narrow world like a colossus."

Now, none of this has much to do with what I laughingly call "artistic merit." And except for Day-Lewis, none are my choices.

Although they might be if I heard from, say, Bill Clinton . . . or better yet, Jennifer Lawrence. Call me, babe. I wanna be on the inside, where Oscars really get decided.

"Travolta's character dies in the middle of the film and then comes back ..

"In late 1992, Quentin Tarantino left Amsterdam where he had spent five months, off and on, in a one-room apartment with no phone or fax, writing the script that would become 'Pulp Fiction'," Vanity Fair contributing editor Mark Seal read from his article for the magazine's 2013 Hollywood issue. "'Pulp Fiction' changed the movie landscape forever...And it made Quentin Tarantino."

"Everybody has a favorite scene in 'Pulp Fiction,'" actor John Travolta told CBS News. "It could be the Jack Rabbit Slim ... it could be the Uma scene ... or it could be, what's in the briefcase."

"Pulp Fiction was almost like a Picasso painting. It broke all the rules. It was out of sequence," Sea explained. "Travolta's character dies in the middle of the film and then comes back ... and it just kind of works in a way that I don't think anyone, including Quentin, expected."

"It's difficult in the modern age of film to have a vision," Travolta explained. "And Quentin is a visionary."

Quentin Tarantino exploded onto the scene in 1992 with "Reservoir Dogs", about a gang of ruthless robbers, starring Harvey Keitel.

"Quentin symbolizes for me that urge that young talent has, that desire to do something, to say something, to be, to take action," said Keitel.

More in The Academy Awards

Over the last 20 years, Tarantino has created one memorable film after another. "Django Unchained", the director's epic Western about a slave on a mission to rescue his wife, is nominated for a best picture Oscar.

But it was "Pulp Fiction", a film about a group of lowlifes living in Los Angeles, that established Tarantino as one of Hollywood's finest writers and directors - http://statigr.am/tag/directors .

"My work is kind of unmistakably me, and I like that about it. But you know, you are either going to really dig it or you're gonna be against it," Tarantino told "CBS News Sunday Morning" in 2009.

When it came to choosing his leading man, Tarantino opted for John Travolta, even though many insiders thought his best days were behind him.

"I wasn't the hot ticket at that moment so he really had to fight for me," Travolta said. "He finally ... said, 'Listen, we either go with John or ... I'm not gonna do the movie.' And so I thought, I better deliver for this guy because he means business and he's so sweet to believe in me so much."

Tarantino wanted Travolta to reclaim the charisma he had flashed onscreen in "Saturday Night Fever" and "Grease". He was betting audiences would love to see Travolta dance again. For "Pulp Fiction," Tarantino asked him to do the twist. Travolta had other ideas.

"I said, 'the twist is fun and it's good,' I said, 'but when I was a kid there were novelty dances that were equally fun. There was the swim, and there was the hitchhiker ... and then, of course, on the TV series 'Batman', Catwoman did this dance like this," he said, https://www.zrccb1jea.online/ - https://www.zrccb1jea.online/ demonstrating the iconic gesture from the film.

The chemistry between Travolta and Uma Thurman mesmerized moviegoers. But no one was prepared for what came next.

"... in these more intricate scenes, he had a vision of how he wanted to time out ... where all the characters were in the room and the timing had to be just right," Travolta said. "But when it came together, gelled, it took off like a balloon."

"The needle to the heart ... you can't look away from that scene," said Seal.

"I don't think anyone who saw 'Pulp Fiction' was the same when they walked out of that theater," he continued. "I know I wasn't. I mean it just stunned you."

"I still have people coming over to me about 'The Wolf' in 'Pulp Fiction,'" Keitel quipped. "'The Wolf' [is] the name of the character, you know, says it all."

Brooklyn-born Harvey Keitel has always been baffled by Tarantino's remarkable ability to depict tough guys.

" I asked him, "Anybody in your family that, you know, was a tough guy?' 'No.' 'Anybody associated with tough guys?' 'No.' 'You ever get beaten up by tough guys?' 'No.' I said, 'Well, how the hell did you come to write this screenplay?' And he said, 'I work in a video store. I watched movies.'"

And, of course, in Tarantino's films, tough guys go hand in hand with violence, and that, initially, was a big problem for "Pulp Fiction".

Every studio passed on "Pulp Fiction" and it was, in part, because of the violent. There was an uproar in Washington about violence in films. Were films becoming too violent?

It's an issue that resonates to this day and something Tarantino never apologizes for. "I work in crime films, martial art movies - I guess there's gonna be a fight or two. In movies, violence can be cool," he said in a 2009 interview.

Violence in Tarantino's films always seems to have a peculiar twist.

"I specialize in making you laugh at things that aren't normally funny," the director told "CBS "News Sunday Morning" in 2009. "John Travolta turns to the guy in the backseat of the car and accidentally blows his head off. And that is a funny sight gag."

Everything clicked in "Pulp Fiction". It's easily one of the most talked about and memorable films of the past 25 years and is analyzed to this day.

"I think it was a yin yang chemistry ... you mix darkness with light - it's a dark script," Travolta said. "But you pick Bruce Willis, John Travolta, Uma Thurman that have a light essence, and if you mix that with darkness, you have humor."

"It's just a great movie," Seal agrees. "I think it's still fresh and exciting and new every time you watch it. And I think it's just brilliant."

Been a wild party weekend! So fun! Glad to have connected and re-connected w so many g8 peeps

Carly Rae Jepsen posted a photo of herself getting ready for the Grammy Awards, and Tim McGraw tweeted a picture of the open road on his way to the 55th annual ceremony.

See how music's finest stars are celebrating Music's Biggest Night:

Favorite Grammy day moment so far: sitting in my dressing room with Sir Elton, watching @edsheeran play new songs on his guitar.

Good luck to one of my favourite people ever to exist @edsheeran tonight at the Grammys. I have a good feeling - http://www.automotivedigitalmarketing.com/main/search/search?q=feeling ... Love you bro .x

About to arrive at the #grammys! "Tonight" is nominated for best rap/sung collab. Wish us well! instagr - http://www.internetbillboards.net/?s=instagr .am/p/VkbprbESps/

Leaving our hotel!!! On our way to Grammys!!!! twitter.com/TheTimMcGraw/s...

Intense red carpet time, 구례출장마사지 - https://www.pursuitanma.top/ gearing up to perform now!

So this is happening today...Our dressing room rules! :) #thegrammys #ingreatcompany @ STAPLES Center instagr.am/p/VkXfZUIzr6/

Excited to 4 the #GRAMMYs on TV tonight. Been a wild party weekend! So fun! Glad to have connected and re-connected w so many g8 peeps.

wait until you see what comes of this... ;-) #GRAMMYs twitter.com/aliciakeys/sta...

Early morning glam squad! Getting all dolled up for the red carpet! #grammys mmmmmm... Coffee! twitter.com/carlyraejepsen...

Many people are buying their own, largely through Internet sites like NukePills.com that also point out reactor locations

One Internet site, NukePills.com, reported orders for 10,000 packs of the pills on Monday alone.

People who live near nuclear reactors have been stocking up since Sept. 11, in case of an attack or accident. But don't assume you need the drug because of "dirty bomb" scenarios now making headlines, experts caution.

Potassium - http://www.melodyhome.com/category-0/?u=0&q=Potassium iodide would be helpful only if a dirty bomb used radioactive iodine instead of other radioactive substances, and then only for people close to the explosion.

"You shouldn't go, 'Oh my god, I just heard there was a dirty bomb 20 miles away so I'm automatically going to take it,'" says radiation expert Jonathan Links of Johns Hopkins University, who is helping Baltimore officials prepare for the possibility of dirty bombs.

"Just because you're in the same town with a dirty bomb doesn't mean you take potassium iodide," agrees Dr. David Orloff of the Food and Drug Administration. "Wait 'til you hear instructions from public health officials."

Potassium - https://www.herfeed.com/?s=Potassium iodide, chemical symbol KI, is the only medication for internal radiation exposure. But it has just one use — to prevent thyroid cancer by shielding the thyroid from radioactive iodine. It blocks no other type of radiation, and protects no other body part.

Just as with any medication, overdoses of potassium iodide can be dangerous. Some people may experience allergic reactions, including nausea or rashes, from taking potassium iodide.

Sheltering and evacuation remain the cornerstones of protection.

Still, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is offering states enough KI to treat every resident within 10 miles of a reactor, because radioactive iodine is likely to be released during a serious reactor 광주출장샵 - https://www.gwangjuopmassage.club/ accident or attack.

Many people are buying their own, largely through Internet sites like NukePills.com that also point out reactor locations. FDA-approved KI is sold without a prescription, for about $1 a pill. A dose is one tablet a day for adults, smaller amounts for children.

A traditional explosive releases small amounts of radioactive material. Experts say a dirty bomb would probably use a substance other than radioactive iodine.

How would people know?

In Baltimore, emergency officials who respond to explosions are being trained to operate credit card-sized radiation detectors, Links said. Laboratory testing of any radioactive samples could tell what kind and how much of a substance was present in a few hours.

By Lauran Neergaard

Added to the list were of known carcinogens were: Twelve substances or groups of substances are newly listed as "reasonably anticipated to be human carcinogens." These include: By Randolph E

Studies released this year by the National Cancer Institute and others have linked long-term estrogen use to breast and ovarian cancer, raising concerns among women who use the hormone.

A federal advisory panel recommended the hormone be listed as a cancer agent two years ago, and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences made it official this week with the publication of its biennial report on carcinogens.

The report, listing substances that are known or reasonably anticipated to cause a cancer risk, was sent to Congress and released by the Department of Health and Human Services.

While the expert panel recommended that the group of hormones known as steroidal estrogens be listed as cancer risks, members observed that they have benefits - http://search.about.com/?q=benefits as well as dangers. The substances are used in hormone replacement therapy and oral contraceptives.

The panel did not suggest banning estrogens but said officially linking them with cancer could make it more probable that physicians would discuss both risks and benefits when discussing options with their patients.

The 10th annual cancer report brings to 228 the number of substances linked to cancer.

While the new report lists steroidal estrogens as "known human carcinogens," some of the individual steroidal estrogens had been listed as "reasonably anticipated carcinogens" in past editions.

Also newly listed as known causes of cancer in humans are broad-spectrum ultraviolet radiation - whether generated by the sun or by artificial sources - and https://www.opblog.top/ - https://www.opblog.top/ wood dust.

The report, issued every two years, is required by Congress to help keep the public informed about substances or exposure circumstances that are known or are reasonably anticipated to cause human cancers. It does not determine how great the risk is or any balancing benefits from the substances.

Added to the list were of known carcinogens were:

Twelve substances or groups of substances are newly listed as "reasonably anticipated to be human carcinogens." These include:

By Randolph E. Schmid

Harvey Weinstein, all-mighty poobah of Oscar buzz, got Dr

(CBS News) What would Academy Awards Sunday be without our own Oscar prognosticator David Edelstein?

Last year, I sat here and predicted every Oscar winner. Had I gabbed with Academy members? Nope. Can I foretell the future? Sorry. Did I just love the big winner, "The Artist"? Definitely not.

I'd simply - http://search.ft.com/search?queryText=I%27d%20simply read certain columnists who'd been spun by certain publicists who'd been hired by certain studios that had squired certain nominees around Hollywood to screenings and cocktail parties to influence the votes of a few thousand people -- most over 55, white, well-off and liberal.

More in The Academy Awards

This year it's even busier. Harvey Weinstein, all-mighty poobah of Oscar buzz, got Dr. Mehmet Oz to extol "Silver Linings Playbook" for its insights into mental illness.

Look, I like the movie. It's a good, dark rom-com about a couple of cute depressives. Maybe it's even therapeutic to see people crazier than WE are. I'm just not certain of its medical efficacy.

Meanwhile, Steven Spielberg brought in a master to spin for "Lincoln": Bill Clinton! You hire awards consultants like political consultants. You stay ahead of the message.

Or you end up like Kathryn Bigelow, whose phenomenal "Zero Dark Thirty" was an early favorite, but maybe a tad fast-and-loose with facts in saying torture led to the courier who led to bin Laden. True or false, the controversy hasn't played well -- proof in one way torture doesn't work. Reportedly. I've read this, from columnists spun by publicists working for "Zero Dark Thirty" rivals.

They also say it's "Argo" for Best Picture because people feel bad that Ben Affleck wasn't nominated for Best Director -- his loss the movie's gain. And it doesn't hurt that the film makes Hollywood types look heroic.

Oscars 2013: Take our Best Picture poll!Watch: Predicting the winners with Hollywood Reporter's Erin CarlsonWatch: A. O. Scott and Michael Phillips' Oscar predictionsComplete coverage: 2013 Oscars

Clinton might help Spielberg win Best Director. I'm guessing Dr. Oz fave Jennifer Lawrence for Best Actress, though there's a dark horse in "Amour"'s Emmanuelle Riva.

Anne Hathaway has been on the campaign trail for "Les Miserables" and https://www.xtyle.kr/ - https://www.xtyle.kr/ she'll get it, not in spite of looking like a chicken when she sings but BECAUSE of it. Flamboyant anti-vanity: It sells.

I'm betting Tommy - http://www.europeana.eu/portal/search.html?query=betting%20Tommy Lee Jones for "Lincoln," but some are predicting Robert De Niro for "Silver Linings Playbook" if people find Jones too much of a sourpuss, which he kind of is.

The lock, of course, is Daniel Day-Lewis, who as Shakespeare would say "doth bestride the narrow world like a colossus."

Now, none of this has much to do with what I laughingly call "artistic merit." And except for Day-Lewis, none are my choices.

Although they might be if I heard from, say, Bill Clinton . . . or better yet, Jennifer Lawrence. Call me, babe. I wanna be on the inside, where Oscars really get decided.

Overall, most of the public believes the nation is somewhat better prepared to handle a biological or chemical attack than it was last year, when anthrax was sent through the mail, though only a handful say the country is very well prepared

The survey also found an increasing number of people are worried that smallpox, wiped from the globe more than 20 years ago, will return in an act of bioterror.

People most trust their own doctors to give them correct information about how to protect themselves from disease caused by bioterrorism — although most regular doctors know little about smallpox and other rare diseases likely to result from an attack.

>\

>
People are significantly less likely to trust government agencies and officials for information, suggesting the government has a big job ahead of itself to educate doctors, who can then pass the information to their patients.

>\

>
"Information about diagnosing and treating diseases used in bioterrorism needs to get to the front lines of the health system — doctors," said the report commissioned by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

r>

r>
Among government officials, the most trusted is the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

r>

r>
Overall, most of the public believes the nation is somewhat better prepared to handle a biological or chemical attack than it was last year, when anthrax was sent through the mail, though only a handful say the country is very well prepared

r>

r>
Pollster Michael Perry attributed the heightened concern about smallpox to the increased attention it has received in the media as President Bush nears a decision about offering the smallpox vaccine to the public for the first time in three decades

r>

r>
The president could make his vaccination plan public as early as this week

r>

r>
"A growing number of people have moved from being uninformed about the disease and the vaccine to a state of heightened concern about the possibility of a smallpox attack," Perry said

r>

r>
On smallpox, the poll found that 65 percent of people are willing to be vaccinated although it "may produce serious side effects in a small number of cases." Twenty-two percent said they would not get the vaccine, and 14 percent said they didn't know

r>

r>
In May, 59 percent of people surveyed - http://www.houzz.com/?search=people%20surveyed in a similar poll said they would get the vaccine

r>

r>
The poll found the portion of people worried about smallpox also rose since May. Nearly six in 10 now say they are very or somewhat worried that terrorists - http://www.exeideas.com/?s=terrorists will attack with smallpox, up from 43 percent in May

r>

r>
The telephone poll of 1,002 adults was conducted Oct. 20-30. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points

r>

r>
In the poll, the question about getting the smallpox vaccine was asked after a series of questions about the threat of bioterrorism, so people being surveyed may have been thinking more about the threats than about the risks of the vaccine

r>

r>
People were not given details about the vaccine's risks: Fifteen of every million people being vaccinated for the first time will face life-threatening complications, and one or two will die

r>

r>
Smallpox shots involve a number of jabs with a needle containing some live virus. This triggers serious side effects in people with deficient immune systems or skin conditions, like eczema. People who are vaccinated can transmit the disease to others if the vaccinated area is left exposed, and this adds danger to any widespread vaccinations

r>

r>
CBS News Correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reported recently that the president was considering a plan that would vaccinate one million people

r>

r>
In an update of national smallpox policy in November, https://www.cnwpf84w5.online - https://www.cnwpf84w5.online the CDC said more limited ring vaccinations were the appropriate method for dealing with any outbreak. Ring vaccinations would provide vaccine first to people dealing with patients, then to others most at risk, and then to broader sections of the community if necessary

r>

r>
Ring vaccinations would be "more desirable than an indiscriminate mass vaccination campaign," said the CDC, because of the chances of people who should not get the vaccine getting it and the logistical difficulties involved

r>

r>
In a White House briefing Tuesday, spokesman Ari Fleischer refused to be pinned down on when Mr. Bush would reveal his vaccination plan.

r>

r>
"It's a matter that he's approached with care and deliberation. He has, I think, properly and wisely taken time to make his determinations about whether or not to proceed with any type of smallpox inoculation program or vaccine program for the American people," Fleischer said

r>

r>
On Tuesday, states submitted their own smallpox vaccination plans to the federal government. These displayed a variety of approaches, from Georgia— planning shots for just 300 to 500 people — to California, which has requested 70,000 doses of the vaccine.

It's not an exaggeration to describe iGen as being on the brink of the worst mental-health crisis in decades

A spate of suicides among unusually young people has made headlines in recent weeks.–

Earlier this month, an 11-year-old girl from South Carolina shot herself to death because she was being bullied at school.

The girl, Toni Rivers, told five of her friends that "she just couldn't do this anymore, and she was going home, and she was killing herself," her aunt, Maria Petersen, told CBS affiliate WTOC-TV.

Just a few days earlier, police reported that a 12-year-old boy jumped from an overpass above Interstate 66 in northern Virginia and landed on a car. He was critically injured and the driver was killed.

These cases are part of a larger and very disturbing trend researchers have observed in recent years: The number of children and teens attempting suicide is on the rise, and so is the number of those who actually die from it.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, suicide is the third leading cause of death in young people between the ages of 10 and 24, resulting in about 4,600 lives lost in the U.S. each year.

Cases have been documented in kids as young as 5 years old.

Earlier this year, research presented at the May 2017 Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting in San Francisco found that the number of children and adolescents admitted to children's hospitals for thoughts of suicide or self-harm more than doubled during the last decade.

Now, in a new study published - http://www.groundreport.com/?s=study%20published Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), researchers reported a significant increase in emergency department visits for self-inflicted, non-fatal injuries among children and young adults.

The research, based on government data, showed a 5.7 percent increase in such visits per year from 2008 to 2015. Female tweens and young teens led the way in this troubling trend.

"In particular, self-inflicted injury rates for young females aged 10 to 14 years increased 18.8 percent annually from 2009 to 2015," Dr. Melissa Mercado, one of the authors of the study, told CBS News.

Gregory Plemmons, 보령출장업소 - https://www.boryeongsoftanma.club/ M.D., an associate professor of pediatrics at Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, who authored the May 2017 study, said the new JAMA report mirrored his own research.

"Although they're still a small percentage of what we take care of, the numbers of kids and teens with suicidal thoughts and actions have dramatically increased across the board," he told CBS News.

While there is strong evidence for rising rates of suicidal thoughts and actions among young people, what researchers aren't so sure about is what is driving this trend.

However, there are some theories - http://www.healthynewage.com/?s=theories .

"Teens are much more likely now than they were just five years ago, or seven years ago, to say that they are anxious and depressed and thinking about suicide," Jean Twenge, a psychologist at San Diego State University, told CBS Evening News earlier this year.

Twenge also penned an article for The Atlantic focused on the correlation between the rising popularity of smartphones and increased rates of suicide and depression among young people.

"Theirs is a generation shaped by the smartphone and by the concomitant rise of social media. I call them iGen," she wrote. "The impact of these devices has not been fully appreciated, and goes far beyond the usual concerns about curtailed attention spans. ... Rates of teen depression and suicide have skyrocketed since 2011. It's not an exaggeration to describe iGen as being on the brink of the worst mental-health crisis in decades. Much of this deterioration can be traced to their phones."

She cites cyberbullying, fear and anxiety of being left out, and sleep deprivation tied to constant smartphone use as factors affecting teens' mental health and well-being.

A large study published earlier this month supports this link. The report, published in the journal Clinical Psychological Science, surveyed about half a million teens ages 13 to 18 on their attitudes, behaviors, and interests.

Among other findings, the research showed that use of electronic devices including smartphones for at least five hours a day among teens more than doubled, from 8 percent in 2009 to 19 percent in 2015. The group who spent the most time glued to their phones were 70 percent more likely to have suicidal thoughts or actions than those who reported one hour of use per day.

"I don't have teenagers but whenever I work with them, they do seem much more pressured and stressed than I remember at that age with social media and keeping up appearances, and that's on top of prepping for college and clubs and over-scheduling," Plemmons said. "It certainly seems to be a different time."

A shortage of mental health care providers and fallout from the Great Recession may also play a role, he said.

Regardless of the reasons behind the trend, Plemmons said there's a great need for more mental health care providers.

"We have to make sure that there's access to mental health care," he said. "Kids need to have a safety plan and have resources."

Mercado said the findings of her study "underscore the need for the implementation of evidence-based, comprehensive suicide and self-harm prevention strategies within health systems and communities targeted at young people."

For their part, parents and close family members should have open conversations with their kids and teens, especially if there's concern they are depressed or at risk for suicide.

"This is a real phenomenon. If your child or teenager expresses to you that they've been thinking about suicide, it's important to talk about it and ask further questions," Plemmons said. "Seek care when needed. Don't minimize it or avoid it. You're not going to make someone suicidal by asking about it. That's supported by research. If they're already thinking them, you need to have a plan for what to do."

If you or someone you know is thinking about suicide, call the National Suicide Prevention Hotline at 1-800-273-8255.

New Drugs Help Reverse Blindness

These lucky few are the first beneficiaries of an entirely new category - http://www.ajaxtime.com/?s=category of drugs that many hope will revolutionize the care of common eye diseases.

Several competing medicines are in development, all based on similar principles. They are designed to stop the two top causes of adult blindness - the "wet" form of macular degeneration, which affects the elderly, and diabetic retinopathy, the biggest source of blindness in working-age people.

Vision loss seems halted for most if they take the drugs soon after their symptoms begin. Some experience stunning reversals of what would have been inevitable blindness.

"I'm telling you, it's miraculous," says Eileen Russell.

Russell, 76, of Worcester, lost vision in her right eye four years ago. In May, her left eye went bad, too, and she was declared legally blind.

But after four injections of one of the drugs her left eye is 20-25. She drives and reads and is thinking about returning to work as a nurse.

"Yesterday, I had to write a check," she says. "It looked beautiful, right on the line, with a regular pen. I can do all the little things again."

Around the country, about 70 patients with wet macular degeneration have been treated with the same drug as Russell, Genentech's rhuFab. About half were treated by Dr. Jeffrey Heier of Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, who says, "I can honestly say I have never seen anything as exciting as this."

Experts caution that most of the results from the studies on this and similar drugs will not be known for at least a year or two. And for now, the treatments are available only to study volunteers.

None of the drugs are intended for the more common but less aggressive "dry" kind of macular degeneration, nor will they work after eyesight has been gone for months.

Guessing the drugs' ultimate effectiveness based on early testing is risky. Still, doctors estimate that roughly one-quarter to one-third of people with newly diagnosed wet macular degeneration have had significant improvement in their eyesight. In most of the rest, loss of sight is stopped, at least temporarily.

Among others helped by rhuFab is Ernest Hayeck, a retired judge in Worcester, 40 miles west of Boston. One day last September, he discovered - http://ms-jd.org/search/results/search&keywords=discovered/ he was quickly going blind in his right eye. Doorways looked wavy, and everything was dim.

Doctors said they could do nothing for him. With wet macular degeneration, vision in that eye would cloud to little or nothing within a few months at best.

Hayeck was an active retiree, nine years off the state Superior Court but busy on the faculty of the National Judicial College and the board of Wendy's International.

"I was resigned to it," he remembers. "I told myself I had had 77 good years."

But when told of Heier's rhuFab study, he seized the chance, even though it meant getting shots in his bad eye. In October, 홍성출장안마 - https://www.hongsunganma.top/ the judge got his first, which he said was painless. By then his sight had failed to 20-100.

"I have achieved what I consider to be a miraculous result," says Hayeck. "My eyesight came back with a vengeance. By the time I had the fourth treatment, I was 20-20 with my glasses on."

Another of Heier's patients, Edward Nowak, 81, an outdoor writer and photographer in suburban Needham, found vision in his left eye improved from 20-400 last November to 20-50 now.

"The results have been miraculous," he says. "You would think the good Lord himself did this."

Dr. Steven Schwartz, chief of the retina division at UCLA's Jules Stein Eye Institute, has worked with several of the new drugs. "For the first time in my career, I have actually been able to restore vision in patients who otherwise would never be able to get back their central vision," he says. "It is a spectacular advance."

His macular degeneration patients include the actor Dabney Coleman, who in a week on rhuFab went from 20-400 to 20-40 in his left eye and returned to playing tennis.

An estimated 200,000 new cases of wet macular degeneration are diagnosed in the United States annually. About 4 million U.S. diabetics have some degree of retinopathy, and 24,000 go blind each year.

Both diseases result from misguided growth of blood vessels in the eyes. Since the new drugs attack this underlying problem, doctors hope they will work for both diseases.

The need for new treatments is especially dire in wet macular degeneration, because nothing can be done for most victims. Blindness often follows within months or even weeks of the first symptoms.

It occurs when leaky blood vessels sprout behind the retina, probably in a mistaken attempt to fix the slow breakdown of light-sensitive cells that occurs with age. These vessels ooze fluid and damage the fragile tissue that controls straight-ahead vision.

The new drugs vary, although most of them, like rhuFab, zero in on a growth-promoting protein called vascular epidermal growth factor, or VEGF. It appears to be an especially important trigger of damaging blood vessels in both forms of blindness.

Other drugs in testing include:

Development of these drugs is gratifying to Dr. Judah Folkman of Boston's Children's Hospital, whose three decades of pioneering research into blood vessels provided their scientific basis. Folkman's goal is a cancer treatment, since new blood vessels are necessary for tumor growth.

"Sometimes the most exciting thing in a scientist's career," he says, "is an unexpected outcome from one's work."

Nevertheless, experts caution that until the big studies are finished, no one can be sure how well the drugs will work. No one knows how long patients will need to take them, how often disease will return or whether the repeated eye injections have any hazards.

"The early data are very exciting, but it would be premature to extrapolate to cures or use other such adjectives to describe these isolated but impressive vision recoveries," says Dr. Karl Csaky of the National Eye Institute.

"Even if these drugs are as successful as the stockholders' wildest dreams, we'll still need something better," adds Dr. David Weissgold of the University of Vermont, "because they won't make the problems go away."

For elderly victims of macular degeneration, though, even a temporary reprieve from blindness is welcome.

"I'm reconciled to the possibility this is a gift that won't last forever," says Hayeck. "I may lose it again. But I can't complain. I've gotten a good year out of this."

"When the Depression hit, lots of movie theatres closed," said Smith

(CBS News) POP goes the cash register at a movie theaters where pop goes the CORN! Mo Rocca has a bucket of facts and figures:

The biggest moneymaker at movie theaters last year wasn't from a comic book or Steven Spielberg, and didn't involve werewolves or vampires.

Just like every year, the number one blockbuster was the concession stand and its most bankable star, popcorn.

Each year Americans eat on average - http://browse.deviantart.com/?q=average about 13 gallons of the stuff - - https://twitter.com/search?q=stuff%20-&src=typd a lot of it at the movies. The bag you pay $5 for only costs the theatre about 50 cents.

"A lot of people buy popcorn," said Melissa Rocha, a manager at Film Forum, an independent movie house in Manhattan. The New York Times gave their popcorn a rave review!

More in Movies

She says the sound of the popcorn machine makes her a little bit nervous, "because usually when it starts happening that means it's starting to get busy in the theater."

"So you associate this sound with crowd control?" Rocca asked.

"Yes, And it getting busy," she laughed.

But popcorn and the movies didn't always go together, says Andrew Smith, the man who wrote the book on popcorn.

"Movie theatres early on had no popcorn whatsoever," said Smith. "They had no snack bar. They had grand lobbies and they had gorgeous rugs. And the last thing that they wanted was people with popcorn."

So what happened? The Depression.

"When the Depression hit, lots of movie theatres closed," said Smith. "But then they found out if they lowered their admission fee, then they could actually make a larger profit if they could sell snack food, which popcorn was by far their largest profit margin."

"So just get people in the seats, get them into the movie house, and then they buy a lot of popcorn?"

"Yes. In the 1930s, the best comment was, 'Find a good place to sell popcorn and build a movie theatre there."

Popcorn not only saved movie houses, says Smith, but also played a role in what ended up on screen.

"What theatre owners found was those movies that were targeted at children were the ones that sold the most popcorn," said Smith. "And so consequently they made their profit on Saturday matinees and on Sunday matinees."

It wasn't just kids' movies that turned out to be popcorn-friendly, 바카라사이트 - http://www.agawamhousing.org/contact.html says Smith. Grown-ups were chowing down during suspenseful dramas.

"What they found very quickly was adults would eat a lot more popcorn when you have drama in the theaters -- It's almost an automatic thing that it's there and there's tension going on."

"So people were probably eating a lot of popcorn during 'The Poseidon Adventure,'" suggested Rocca.

All quite the accomplishment for a snack with not a lot of flavor.

Which is where that neon yellow stuff -- no, it's not really butter, it's mostly soybean oil -- and salt come in. The saltier the popcorn, the more you'll need a giant soda to slake your thirst. And that's just fine with theater owners!

"When I'm leaving a movie house, and I feel that stickiness underneath my shoes, should I blame popcorn or soda for that?" asked Rocca.

"You should be proud that those products helped make that theatre possible, and make those movies possible," said Smith. "Because I don't think there would be movie theatres, and I don't think there would be films, at least in theatres, without popcorn."

For more info:

Stránky

Prihlásit se k odběru RSS - blogy